For information only. Not advice, and not to be relied on. What that means, in full
Marketplace / workbook

Comparative Benchmark Medians — subscriber report

Aggregate medians across assessed systems: where evidence typically fails, by dimension and by product category. Requires five engagements before any statistic is published.

Door B — Independent testingSingle-entity commercial licencenot yet available

Recurring validation. Sells nothing else into this institution.

This does not exist yet, and cannot be bought. It needs a comparative corpus drawn from distinct client engagements, and there are none on file. The outline below is what it would contain. Nothing here takes payment for it.
This one is gated. Access is granted to an organisation and recorded with what was paid and how it was settled; payment is arranged outside this system and no card is handled here. What is in it is set out below in full, so the decision is informed rather than blind. See all resources for where the line between open and gated is drawn, and why.

Tell me when this exists

Comparative Benchmark Medians — subscriber report needs a comparative corpus that does not yet exist. If you would buy it at $1,900, say so — that is what decides whether it gets built.

Your address is used to reply and nothing else. It is not published, not sold, and not added to a mailing list.

Contents

The structure, so you can tell whether it is the thing you need. The body is what access buys.
# Comparative benchmark medians
## What it will contain
- Median dimension scores by product category
- Distribution of evidence tiers by dimension — where the ceiling actually sits
- The three claims most often made at T1 and never raised above it
- Time-to-answer distribution for evidence requests, by vendor category
## Why it is the moat
Headings and list items only. 14 lines in the full document.
GovernanceHub — the governance registry and policy router for AI systems