Contact

Talk to the person who built this.

Rtavan AI LLC is founder-led. There is no sales team, no ticket queue and no chatbot in front of the inbox — which means a reply comes from someone who can actually answer, and that saying “not a fit” costs you one line.

If you are considering this for your clients

Consultancies, auditors and risk advisers: tell us what you are being asked to show, and to whom. Pricing comes in the first reply, and free early access to the method, the corpus and the router comes first if that is useful.

If we have published something about you

Any organisation in the registry has a free right of reply, and every review is recorded in the corrections log — including the ones that changed nothing. A correction is worked before anything else in the queue.

Direct routes

Email, including corrections and right of reply
[email protected]
The company
Rtavan AI LLC, North Carolina, United States
Terms and publisher
Legal, terms and right of reply

Would rather look before you write? Get a demo — four steps on the live system, no account needed.

Frequently asked

No chatbot: written answers, each linking to the page that proves it. If yours is not here, ask the founder and you get a reply from a person.
What does it cost?

Tenant access is priced per practice. Ask, and the price comes in the first reply. The method, the summary figures, the document archive and the corrections log stay free to read.

Ask for pricing →

Can I see it before talking to anyone?

Yes, and without an account: score a document, run a policy decision, verify the evidence chain, and watch a document change. Four steps on the live system, about five minutes.

The demo →

What exactly is this?

A registry that reads what AI vendors publish about governing their systems and scores it against a published method, plus a policy router that applies your own policy before a model is called and writes a tamper-evident record of each decision.

The method →

Do vendors pay you?

No, and they never will — not for a score, a preview, a delay or a briefing. There is no code path that would take the money, and any relationship with an assessed party withdraws the independence claim automatically. A vendor gets a free right of reply and nothing else.

Terms and right of reply →

Why should I trust a score?

Because you do not have to. The method is published so anyone can re-derive a score, every claim carries the source it came from and the date it was read, and the corrections log records every review — including the ones that changed nothing.

Corrections log →

All 12 questions →

Send a message

What are you trying to show, and to whom — a client, an auditor, a regulator, your own board?

Your address is used to reply and nothing else. It is not published, not sold, and not added to a mailing list.

Nothing you send is published, added to a mailing list, or passed to anyone else.

Contact GovernanceHub — founder-led, a real reply